A fan requested if the series of the England series could result at the end of the road for Cheteshwar Pujara and Ajinkya Rahane. This is what the old Indian opener Aakash Chopra responded.
Since the Virat Kohli Indian Captain has issued a statement on the intention of the player after the final loss of WTC in New Zealand, people started speculating on major changes in the test team in the coming days. During the post-match virtual presser, the Indian skipper suggested that the team need players with the right state of mind.
Meanwhile, the ancient Indian node opener Aakash Chopra reacted to the question of a fan on the key of the Kohli Declaration. In his last YouTube video, the fan requested if the performance of the England series could result at the end of the road for Cheteshwar Pujara and Ajinkya Rahane. In response, Chopra said:
“What is the intent? Grandhomme Colin also shows the intention, it comes and starts to go slumbing, is it the good intention? The pants also showed the intention in the second sleeves but was The good intention? ROHIT SHARMA played defensively but I thought it was a positive intention. The pants of Rishabh played with the aggressive intention, but it was probably not the good intention from the point of view of the Indian team. “
“The intention is something that is roughly overestimated sometimes. When Cheteshwar Pujara stood in Sydney, taking blows on the whole body, Ashwin and Hanuma Vihari did that. If you go to Gabba, Pujara was struck by the ball several times. It’s also good intention.
“I have no doubt in my mind that the series of England will be fine for Rahane and Pujara, but everyone has his own style of play. We must respect what you get from Pujara, you will not receive Trousers and what you get from Rahane, you will not receive Kohli. “
Chopra added that the Indian skipper did not mention the fingers to a particular player after the final loss of the WTC.
“Let’s wait and look at. I do not think it distinguishes people, that Pujara or Rahane played slowly. Maybe he only talks about a different spirit that could have been there in the cloakroom, which May not have been so positive. I do not think he spoke of Pujara and Rahane, “he said.
